Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 15-402    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 9/16/2015
Title: Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 707 KENT STREET. (File No. J1512A, Assessment No. 158527)
Sponsors: Dai Thao
Ward: Assessments, Nuisance Abatement, Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 1
Attachments: 1. 707 Kent St.SA#1.05-05-15, 2. 707 Kent St.SA#2.05-13-15, 3. 707 Kent St.WO.05-21-15, 4. 707 Kent St.Photos.5-13-15, 5. 707 Kent St.Photos.5-21-15
Related files: RLH AR 15-56
Title
Ratifying the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Property at 707 KENT STREET. (File No. J1512A, Assessment No. 158527)

Hearing Date(s)
Date of LH: 08/04/15
Date of CPH: 09/16/15

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $450
Service Charge: $40
Total Assessment: $490
Gold Card Returned by: DAVID BUSCH
Type of Order/Fee: SUMMARY ABATEMENT TO REMOVE TIRES / PARKS CHARGE FOR REMOVAL & ADMIN FEES.
Nuisance: FAILURE TO REMOVE TIRES FROM PROPERTY.
Date of Orders: MAY 13, 2015
Compliance Date: MAY 20, 2015
Re-Check Date: MAY 21, 2015
Date Work Done: MAY 21, 2015
Work Order #: PA 15-0038023
Returned Mail?: NO. RESPONDENT CLAIMS SECOND SA NOT RECEIVED.
Comments: THIS IS A VACANT LOT. FIRST SA WAS FOR COUCHES AND TV. RECHECK SHOWED THIS WAS GONE, BUT THERE WAS NOW TIRES. A SECOND SA WAS THEN SENT. TIRES NOT REMOVED.
History of Orders on Property: 06/17/15 TALL GRASS COMPLAINT - DONE BY OWNER; 05/21/15 THE INSTANT CASE REGARDING TIRES; 05/21/15 TALL GRASS COMPLAINT - DONE BY OWNER; 05/05/15 REFUSE COMPLAINT - DONE BY OWNER FOLLOWING SA; 02/23/15 MATTRESS COMLAINT - DONE BY OWNER FOLLOWING SA; 02/09/15 COUCH AND TABLES - DONE BY OWNER FOLLOWING SA.

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Property Clean Up services during May 5 to June 5, 2015. (File No. J1512A, Assessment No. 158527) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It

RESOLVED, that p...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.