Saint Paul logo
File #: RLH TA 15-239    Version:
Type: Resolution LH Tax Assessment Appeal Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Final action: 6/3/2015
Title: Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Real Estate Project No. J1505E, Assessment No. 158307 at 693 CASE AVENUE.
Sponsors: Dan Bostrom
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 6
Attachments: 1. 693 Case Ave.Correction Notice 8-28-14, 2. 693 Case Ave.Photos 9-5-14, 3. 693 Case Ave.EC Letter 12-17-14, 4. 693 Case Ave.Photos 12-17-14
Related files: RLH AR 15-28
Title
Deleting the Appealed Special Tax Assessment for Real Estate Project No. J1505E, Assessment No. 158307 at 693 CASE AVENUE.

Legislative Hearing Dates
Date of LH: April 21, 2015
Date of CPH: June 3, 2015

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $120
Service Charge: $35
Total Assessment: $155
Gold Card Returned by: Yer Moua Yang
Type of Order/Fee: Excessive consumption fees
Nuisance: Failure to maintain exterior of property
Date of Orders: August 28, 2014
Compliance Date: September 15, 2014
Re-Check Date: September 17, 2015
Date Work Done: April 10, 2015
Work Order #: 14-323127 Inv#: 1150142
Returned Mail?: NO
Comments: Correction Notice appealed; LHO gave to 12-1-14 to come into compliance on retaining wall. Inspected on 12-17-14 and wall had not been installed; inspector issued EC. 1-9-15 LHO gave an extension to 6-1-15 for compliance. Inspected on 4-10-15 wall built; building inspector said it was fine, does not need an engineer if under 4 feet.
Recommended deletion per Legislative Hearing Officer and Ward 6 so that owner can come into complaince with the retaining wall

Body
WHEREAS, the Office of Financial Services Real Estate Section has attached to this Council File both a report of completion outlining the costs and fees associated with Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed November 12 to December 29, 2014. (File No. J1505E, Assessment No. 158307) and the assessment roll including all properties for which these assessments are proposed for Council ratification; and

WHEREAS, the City Council’s Legislative Hearing Officer has reviewed an appeal of this assessment and developed a recommendation for the City Council with respect to this assessment; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing having been conducted for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council and having been considered financially satisfactory; Now, Therefore, Be It

RESOLVED, that pursuant to Chapter 14 of the Sai...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.