Saint Paul logo
File #: ALH 11-312    Version: 1
Type: Appeal-Legislative Hearing Status: Filed
In control: Legislative Hearings
Final action: 3/1/2011
Title: Appeal of Special Tax Assessment for 669 DAYTON AVENUE for Project #: J1109A, Assessment #: 118023 in Ward 1
Sponsors: Melvin Carter III
Ward: Special Tax Assessments, Ward - 1
Attachments: 1. 669 Dayton Ave snow letter 12.22.10.pdf
Title
Appeal of Special Tax Assessment for 669 DAYTON AVENUE for Project #: J1109A, Assessment #: 118023 in Ward 1

Body

Legislative Hearing Officer Recommendation
Approve the assessment.

Tax Assessment Worksheet
Cost: $160.00

Service Charge: $140.00

Total Assessment: $300.00

Gold Card Returned by: Marla G?

Type of Order/Fee: Snow letter

Nuisance: Snow walk

Date of Orders: 121.22.10

Compliance Date: 12.25.10

Re-Check Date: 12.29.10

Date Work Done: 12.30.10

Work Order #: 10-939193

Returned Mail?: No

Comments: Two other snow work orders in 2010

History of Orders on Property:

Legislative Hearing Notes 3/1/11

Approve the assessment.

Alex Lindorf, tenant, appeared.

Inspector Essling reported that the assessment at 669 Dayton Avenue is for an Abatement for removal of snow from the public sidewalk. The letter was mailed December 22, 2010 with a compliance date of December 25, 2010. It was re-checked on December 29, 2010 and found to be in non-compliance. A Work Order was sent to Parks and the work was done on December 30, 2010 at a cost of $160 plus a service charge of $140 for a total of $300. The letter was mailed to PRC Acquisitions, LLC in Edina, and the Occupant.

Mr. Lindorf noted that he and PRC Acquisitions arranged that the tenant is responsible for snow removal. For that month, Mr. Lindorf was responsible for the front of the house and his roommate was responsible for the back of the house. He said that he hadn't received a letter in the mail; if he had, he would have addressed it. He landlord said that he hadn't received a letter either. Mr. Essling stated that there was no returned mail.

They viewed the video (sidewalk had not been shoveled full width).

Ms. Moermond stated that there may be a Notice question; however, that is a private issue between Mr. Lindorf, his roommates and his landlord. From the City's perspective, Notice was provided to the owner and the occupant and there was no returned mail. She wi...

Click here for full text
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
No records to display.